Sections
Home | Regional | Government criticized for protecting vested interests

Government criticized for protecting vested interests



Dimapur, September 2 (MExN): The Naga People’s Movement for Human Rights (NPMHR) today sharply criticized the government for protecting vested interests and “the accused” professor K Kannan, the embattled vice chancellor of Nagaland university. Unless the guilty are penalized, NU will continue to be hindered by “controversies”, the organization today reminded in a strong statement.
‘If guilty not penalized, NU will remain a mess’ 
“NPMHR takes serious note of the unqualified patronage and reckless intervention of interested individuals from the State Government. We are quite dismayed that instead of brokering a conducive atmosphere for the issues to take better turn, the state is using its police machinery to give protection to the main accused here, the Vice Chancellor. Nagaland University should not be seen as the last reservoir for money making or as a bastion for fancy developmental projects or as a nepotistic employment industry” stated the NPMHR in a statement today.
If the guilty are not penalized, the organization reminded, Nagaland University will continue to rock with controversies, as the precedence has already been laid. While appreciating the initiatives of the central Fact-Finding Committee, the organization has asked the university’s officials to “prove themselves publicly and locally” with the ‘charges’ of corruption, which the CAG and NUTA has so ‘blatantly and credibly’ highlighted, NPMHR stated.
The organization said to have been closely following Nagaland University since its inception in 1994. “… The Nagas have much to benefit from Nagaland University than what meets the eye today. NPMHR is also fully aware of the controversies that have been dodging the university since its formation. It is unfortunate for the Nagas in particular that a sober beginning for many generations has begun in such revelry manner, which persists even today, primarily drunk with nepotism and corruption issues” it stated.
The NPMHR queries the public on the simple fact that if the staffers, students and teachers, ‘who are the actual backbone, are out there in the streets’ to register their protest, then “something is certainly wrong with the University”. The NPMHR is for smooth functioning of the university and has called for resolving the corruption charges rather than “soothing with a compromise”.

On recent crime index
The NPMHR has also expressed ‘extreme frustrations’ over the recent rape of a pregnant mother by four youths. “Such inhuman and barbaric acts are reflections of how our society is so vulnerably exposed. It demands severest condemnation and punishment. We offer our unsolicited support and express our deepest sympathy to the victim and her family and also pray that she may overcome with strength the anguish of psychological trauma from such unthinkable acts” the statement from convener Atoho K Kiho stated.

Comments (4 posted):

Yeah right! on September 03, 2008 10:01:22
morungexpress
NSF, NMA and now NPMHR...who's next?? HOHO, NBCC, Civil society members?? This is turning out to be a melodrama.
On second thoughts it was just a matter of time for NPMHR to react..Its surprisng that all this organisations are openly supporting the NUTA, where as as a mature body, we expect them to play a more balancing role...its getting not just murkier day by day but the leasers of all this are acting rather fishy...
Yes, who's next? on September 03, 2008 11:00:43
morungexpress
NPMHR, another laughing stock for the Nagas! Why our NGOs are so dumb headed? Admitting they have followed NU closely since its inception in 1994, and " aware of the controversies...since its formation", why do they point finger "the accused" against the VC, who's been at the helm for only about two years? Yes "something is certainly wrong with NU". Know what? Simple, the attitude and mentality of our NUTA makes it too difficult to run a university.
Tutu on September 03, 2008 11:34:59
morungexpress
NSF as a student parent body has the right to intervene but the others, i really dont think so. Maybe its a pressure tactic, unfortunately this tactic has backfired going by public opinions. The funny thing in our state is everybody like to involve in everything. Why cant we leave somethings to experts? NPMHR using the word "accused" is abit too much, when both party's are accusing each other, no one is guilty until proven guilty. The need of the hour is for a mature discussion and not a tug of war game...the students career are at stake for god's sake!
it was no surprise on September 04, 2008 01:19:37
morungexpress
NPMHR at last has cropped up its head and straightaway fired at VC on anticipated lines. Now whose human rights are they talking about? Teachers' rights have been violated because they tried to be a blown up frog? Just because NUTA accused Kannan and other officers do not mean they are guilty. What's the need for NPMHR to come to hasty conclusion without evidence?

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
0
MorungExpress:Latest News|Breaking News|Current News|RNI No:NAGENG/2005/15430. Wire services provided by AP | Powered by vivvo cms.