Dimapur, June 26 (MExN): The NSCN (Khango–Vusshe) on Friday raised concern over the tripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed on June 11, 2026, between the Governments of Assam, Nagaland and the Union Government, for exploration and development of crude oil and natural resources in areas falling within or adjoining the Disputed Area Belt (DAB).
In a statement issued here by its MIP, the NSCN (Khango–Vusshe) cautioned that any initiative involving land and resources in areas where ownership remains contested must not be treated as a mere economic exercise. The group asserted that such matters are “intrinsically linked to history, identity, customary ownership, and the political rights of indigenous peoples.”
Referring to the Article 371A of the Constitution of India, which recognizes and safeguards Naga customary laws, social practices, and ownership rights over land and its resources, the group said, “These protections are not symbolic provisions but fundamental safeguards reflecting the unique historical and political circumstances of the Naga people.” It also maintained that “any arrangement, policy, or agreement that may directly or indirectly affect these constitutional guarantees must be subjected to careful scrutiny to ensure that the spirit and intent of Article 371A remain fully respected and preserved.”
The NSCN (Khango–Vusshe) underscored that genuine development cannot be pursued at the expense of historical rights or unresolved political issues. It emphasized that sustainable progress can only be achieved with the “confidence, participation and consent” of the people whose lands and resources are involved.
It reiterated that the Nagas have “never relinquished their inherent rights over their ancestral lands” and that their “history, identity, culture and territorial heritage of the Naga people remain inseparable from their collective consciousness and political aspirations.”
It cautioned that any attempt by individuals, organizations, or external forces to exploit prevailing circumstances for territorial, political, or strategic advantage at the expense of Naga interests would be viewed with “utmost seriousness.”
While acknowledging the desire of both Assam and Nagaland to pursue economic growth and developmental opportunities, the NSCN (Khango–Vusshe) urged the governments to approach the issue with “utmost caution, transparency and accountability.”
