K Puroh
Development, in all its genuine forms, is welcome, except those linked to militarization and defense infrastructure. This position remains steadfast because successive generations of Nagas continue to understand and uphold the fundamental objective of Naga self-determination.
History itself offers a profound lesson. Before the arrival of Western colonial powers, the Indian subcontinent was among the most advanced regions of the world in terms of economy, culture, craftsmanship, and intellectual achievement. Yet, under nearly two centuries of British colonial rule, India was systematically exploited in the name of development and progress.
The British introduced railways, roads, ports, and telegraph networks across the subcontinent. However, these projects were not primarily designed for the welfare or empowerment of the Indian people. Rather, they served colonial interests: to extract raw materials from the land, transport them efficiently to ports, and ship them to Britain to sustain its industries and economic growth.
Infrastructure became an instrument of imperial control and economic exploitation.
By the time the British departed in 1947, India, once regarded as one of the wealthiest regions of the world, had been reduced to widespread poverty and economic dependence. Even after nearly eight decades of Independence, the scars and structural consequences of colonial exploitation continue to affect the nation.
For the Naga people, this historical experience carries an important warning. The Government of India may continue to introduce development projects in Naga territories, and many of these may appear beneficial on the surface. Yet, not all forms of development necessarily align with the political aspirations and historical rights of the Nagas.
Development without political dignity can become a mechanism of control. Infrastructure without sovereignty can create dependency rather than empowerment. Economic advancement, if detached from the larger question of self-determination, may gradually weaken a people’s political consciousness and collective future.
Therefore, the need of the hour for every successive Naga generation is discernment, wisdom, and vigilance. We must carefully examine the nature, intent, and long-term implications of every development initiative. We must distinguish between development that strengthens the people and development that silently undermines their political identity and aspirations.
The question before us is not whether development should come, but what kind of development serves the interests, rights, and future of the Naga people.
Only through such collective awareness and vigilance can we ensure that history will judge the present generation kindly.
(Views expressed are personal)
