For the past several decades, the use of Naga diplomacy in both internal and external modern politics has been disappointing, and its role is underutilized if not undermined. Having a vibrant Naga diplomatic corps is another significant component to the range of options necessary for peacebuilding at various levels in our culture. Its presence has the potential to stop conflict situations from escalating. However, in the absence of diplomacy the use of force and violence has been used as a means for resolving conflict. Naga diplomacy has become stagnant, rigid and ineffective, and its failure to develop and modernize has ironically strengthened the rationale that violent responses are acceptable because they appear to work. Unfortunately, this mistaken belief has been counterproductive and has further weakened the role of Naga diplomacy in the area of peacemaking.
The lack of intent to develop an effective and relevant Naga diplomacy has proven costly for the Nagas, and differences which could have otherwise been resolved through diplomatic and non-violent means have become acutely polarized with the potential to turn violent and harmful. The absence of diplomacy also indicates the lack of safety nets that can prevent situations from becoming violent.
In the fast developing world of modern polity, diplomacy is at the forefront of global affairs; and it is imperative for nations to develop their own art and principles of diplomacy. It is difficult to imagine how Nagas can effectively interact and foster political regional and international relations unless and until Nagas develop its own art of diplomacy in protecting and furthering its rights and interests. This would raise the Naga visibility to another level on the world stage.
Recovering and developing an art of Naga diplomacy is more urgent than ever. It is a significant means of forming relationships based on trust and communicating with the broader community and to resolve situations. These relationships could span from government officials, as well as reaching to the grassroots and organizations and institutions. Again, it is one of the ways to strengthen peacebuilding efforts through nonviolent means and offers the potential for mid-level leadership that will connect across groups throughout Nagaland. The Naga society at large and particularly the civil society would greatly benefit from developing diplomacy as a means of reaching out both within and without.
Diplomacy is a means through which the Naga worldview and aspirations can be represented and acknowledged. Developing an expanded understanding and use of diplomacy can enable and empower the Nagas towards a dynamic praxis of action and reflection that is essential to coexisting harmoniously.
